Welcome to Our Website

Download visual basic 6.0 with cracks

How to Make an Advanced Keygen in Visual Basic 2020/2020/2020

Visual Basic was one of the most popular programming environments and and double click the file "cdkey" and input the serial nomber. Free BASIC Compilers, Interpreters and Development Environment. Installing Visual Basic under Linux. In VISUAL BASIC 6 - Duration: 12: 18. How to create a WebBrowser in visual Basic 6.0 First you must open Visual Basic 6.0 Then select "Standard EXE" Right click on the control panel to the left a.

TimeSerial Function - VB 6.0 (Visual Basic 6.0)

How to Crack Visual Basic 2020 Express Edition NO SERIAL KEY more info here. This how to make a simple keygen on visual basic. I am showing you how to install visual basic 6.0 in windows 10. Learn all procedure S. VISUAL BASIC 6.0 Image Viewer Application [vb 6.0]. Download visual basic 6.0 enterprise edition for free.

How to make a keygen in Visual Basics 6.0

  • DirectX9 Visual Basic 6
  • Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0 Installation by Daathh32
  • Visual Basic 6.0 On Windows 7/8/8.1/10
  • Serial number free serial number key download
  • Vb6 - Difference between Visual Basic 6.0 and VBA
  • Download Microsoft Visual Basic Runtime
  • How to Call Crystal Report from Visual Basic 6.0.
  • How to install visual basic 6.0 in windows 10
  • Visual Basic 6.0 Moving object

Serial number how To Make A Key Generator Acting Program Using VB6

Get mother board serial numbers and CPU IDs in Visual Basic 6: Description: This example shows how to use WMI to get mother board serial numbers and CPU IDs in Visual Basic 6. Keywords: serial number, cpu, cpu id, WMI, Windows Management Instrumentation, Visual Basic 6: Categories: Software Engineering, Windows, Miscellany. Download ms visual basic 6.0 zip for free. Visual Basic Enterprise Edition crack #Tags: microsoft, visual, basic, enterprise, edition Microsoft Visual Basic Enterprise Edition crack RatingRelated DownloadsDownloads Advanced Microsoft Visual Basic (Mps) patch Microsoft Visual Basic Express Beta 2 crack Microsoft Visual Basic Express Edition patch Microsoft Visual Basic! We can find the factorial of any number which is greater than or equal to 0(Zero). Hello Friends, today i'm going to show you Visual Basic 6 0 In this tutorial i will tell you that how to Install Visual Basic 6 0 on Windows 7 8 10 download.

Patch vb6 - In Visual Basic 6.0, how do I move to a specific

Visual basic 6.0 with cracks.

Visual Basic 6.0 - Free Student Projects

Microsoft Visual Basic 6 0 - CNET Download. However, when I try to install VB6 in Windows 10, the installer stalls after a short time and becomes "not responding". The Modern Hamradio Log4WinNet Log is new application what writen on Net Framework v 4.0 is intended for radioamateurs for logging QSOs - The program UR5FCM Log (Log4Win) is 32-bit Windows application development by Visual Basic ver 6.0 (SP3). To receive strings from the serial port. C#, the braces, {}, are used to delimit blocks, which is more familiar to programmers with experience in other widely deployed languages such as C++ and Java.

Visual-basic-6 - How to show field/row serial number on

Download: MPlay3 hostyle Source code from mPlay3. How to Crack Visual Basic 2020 Express Edition NO SERIAL KEY - Duration: 1. PC games with cracked serial numbers or activation codes are widely. You have viewed too many serial numbers from your ip ( today, please, press CTRL+D to bookmark our site and return tomorrow. Build and run a small application.

Visual Basic Sample Codes

Visual Studio Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, macOS, and Windows. You Need No Registration Key To Activate Visual Basic 2020 Express Edition! Microsoft Visual Basic 4.0. How To Download Visual Basic 6.0 For Windows 7/8/10 - Duration: 8: 00. This application was made using visual studio 2020, not that i would recommend it, but i just wanted to play around with it You can make this in visual basic.

  • WinWorld: Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0
  • How to make a keygen in Visual Basic 2020! [VERY EASY]
  • Visual Basic 6.0 Calculo de Promedio
  • How to make a keygen (Visual Basic)
  • Bus Reservation System in VB6.0


The Main aim of the project is how to secure our package using activation key? Games - Visual Basic Tutorial. Visual basic 6.0; Inconsistent accessibility C#; How to import Xml file into a table in MS-ACCESS database using Visual Basic 6.0? Assuming you all are beginners to visual basic, each and every lesson in this tutorial is explained step by step with examples and source code. Making a Keygen with VB 6.0 [TUTORIAL] Making a Keygen with VB 6.0 [TUTORIAL] Making a Keygen with VB 6.0 [TUTORIAL] Making a Keygen with VB 6.0[TUTORIAL.

Activation code serial COM port development using Visual Basic

How to Create a Simple Keygen using Visual Basic 6.0 get more information. Que tal camaradas les dejo este video en donde se muestra como instalar de manera optima el visual basic 6.0 en windows 10 x64, espero que les sirva el video. Visual Basic documentation. John Conway: Surreal Numbers - How playing games led to. Visual basic 6.0 with registration key.

Free Visual Basic exercises - Wise Owl

Get Microsoft Visual Basic alternative downloads. Download source code - 30.2 KB; Introduction. Try our Mac & Windows code editor, IDE, or Azure DevOps for free. This is a guide on how to install VB6 for modern versions of Windows. Here we are providing visual basic 6.0 projects with ms access database download with source code and documentation.

Renaming Files - VB 6 forum - developer Fusion
1 Tutorial "PROYECTO EN VISUAL BASIC 6.0" 88%
2 Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0 Enterprise crack serial key 92%
3 How To Make A Generator Key With Visual Basic 6 - Full HD Video 35%
5 Introduction of Visual Basic Bangla Tutorial (Part-1 11%
6 Learning Visual Basic 6 Programming: Lesson 1 50%
7 Visual Basic 2020 Tutorial Serial-Generator 61%
8 Visual Studio 2020 Ultimate Master Product Key 10000% 77%

Rating the games that have kept me sane during the neverending argentine quarantine [Part 2]

Obligatory sorry for sorry if english bad cause english actually good.

I'm back to share with you the next set of games I've completed while in lockdown, but first of all, lemme just say: thank you for liking my previous entry!

This time around, I added separators between each game so the post is less confusing (no, "Platinum" is not a game, you're not stuck in a time loop as far as I know as far as I know as far as I know). Sorry about that!

Without further ado...

Marvel's Spider-Man - 9.0 / 10
An absolute must-play if you own a PS4. The combat is smooth, fast, and fun; you can do some pretty crazy combos if you're good at this type of game which I wasn't. I actually died more times than I cared to admit. I played on Easy. There are many collectibles but fear not, swinging around is incredibly fun; the fact that I got most of them before beating the game speaks for itself.
Platinum Trophy: Got it. Like I said, getting the collectibles is no biggie and everything else will come naturally for the most part. No missable trophies either. 4 / 10.

The Sims 4 - 7.0 / 10
The year is 2014. New technologies are starting to push the boundaries of what videogames can achieve. Worlds get bigger, more detailed; gameplay and cinematics blend into one; sequels take the concept of their predecessor to a whole new level; meanwhile The Sims 4 wants you to pay $40 to get rainy days. Listen, I enjoyed the game, it's the same old Sims, after all -- but that's kind of the problem. There's a 14 year gap between the first and forth entry in this series, and the latter barely does anything new besides looking prettier. Every single interesting feature (seasons, pets, jobs, you name it) has been stripped away and locked behind a paywall. I won't tell how much it would cost to buy all the DLCs, but let's just say you might be better off buying a PS5 / XSX instead.
Platinum Trophy: Got it. Don't trust the guides since most of them are missing a crucial update: now the game counts with a Gallery, which lets you download other people's sims. Some of them are made specifically to get the trophies. Just boot them up and they'll pop within minutes. Beautiful. 2 / 10.

For Honor - 7.0 / 10
Not sure if anyone will relate to this, but this is the kind of game that, the more you play it, the more you hate it. Overall it's fun, it has a good learning curve, and landing hits feels super satisfying; I just think the game is not what it wanted to be. Methodical combat? Nah bro just spam the same combo over and over. Competitive Scene? Non-existant. Honor? Y-You know, the name of the game? Nope, sorry, everyone plays Dominion, a 3v3 gank-fest of a game mode.
Platinum Trophy: Lamely, some trophies are related to dead gamemodes, so I will only hold this platinum in my dreams; then again, I'm on the South America servers, maybe you guys still stand a chance. Ignoring the unobtainable trophies, I'd give it a 6 / 10.

Grim Fandango Remastered - 10 / 10
Back in the day I had one of those bulky PCs + good ol' Windows XP. I had already discovered my love for gaming and spent hundreds of hours in Warcraft 3 and other games. A relative of mine lent me a CD, "Grim Fandango" written on it. Long story short, I got so absorbed by the characters, the funny dialogue, the world, the art, the music, that I didn't even care how shit I was at solving puzzles. In the end, I didn't manage to beat it but it stayed on my mind ever since, and I became a fan of other Lucasarts entries (Monkey Island mainly), and point-and-click games in general.
Years later, I managed to finish it (why did I wait so long?). To give me some credit, some puzzles in this game are absolute BS, but nevermind that -- The charm and beauty of Grim Fandango makes it an unforgettable journey, and I'm confident to say it's one of my favourite games ever. I knew this ever since I played it all those years ago.
Platinum Trophy: Ok so fuck memorable experiences, here's the real deal: the platinum is piss easy. Worse part is having to play with the old tanky controls (there's a trophy that demands it). 2 / 10.

Sonic Forces - 6.0 / 10
Speaking of memorable experiences... this is not one. To be fair, I've never been into Sonic, but this game doesn't really do a good job at changing that. Gameplay is decent, level design is ok at best. I did really like the way you could customize your character, actually, but that's not saying much.
Platinum Trophy Didn't bother with this one, but I guess it's not too hard if you're into it, just time-consuming. You need to reach max level with a lot of different character and get S rankings in all levels, if I remember correctly. Seems like a 6 / 10.

Hyper Sentinel - 7.5 / 10
Ok so hear me out: this game was 12 cents. Even for an Argentine that's pocket change. Said "why not", pulled the trigger and, what do you know, it's actually good! A quick-paced, arcadey game in which you control a spaceship and you shoot at bigger spaceships and when you destroy them you can fight the stage boss which is also a spaceship. It's... it's fun. Pretty good way to kill a few hours, which is more than enough considering the price.
Platinum Trophy: Rather easy, although repetitive. You need to complete the 3 modes of the game (normal, speedrun and boss rush) on all 3 difficulties. 4.5 / 10.

Portal Knights - 7.5 / 10
RPG Minecraft. What can I say, it was entertaining, probably better if you have friends to play with. Obviously childish but that's not a deal-breaker for me. The combat is fun but super simple. There are 3 bosses, none of which prove to be challenging.
Platinum Trophy: Hey, do you like the special events the game has every once in a while? Yes? Well then why don't you complete 200 of those motherfuckers. That's right. I did it... with a glitch; it basically allowed me to do the same event over and over again. Overall, nothing too challenging besides risking your mental health. 5 / 10.

The Swapper - 8.0 / 10
A very interesting platformer in which you create clones of yourself in order to solve puzzles. It can get pretty tricky. Solid visuals and atmosphere. A cool concept that will grant you a couple of hours of fun.
Platinum Trophy: There's no platinum. The trophy list for this one is pretty weird. You'll beat the game without getting a single one; instead, all you need to do is to find every single secret collectible in the game, aka hop into Youtube and follow a guide to avoid some serious headaches, cause they're not easy to find. 2 / 10.

The Town of Light - 6.8 / 10
A historical piece dressed as a horror game. In The Town of Light, you'll visit an abandoned mental hospital while piecing together the character's past, based on a real story. It's a crude and sad experience tainted by bad graphics and occasional stutter. It has bugs and titties so it's a mixed bag. If it sounds interesting to you, and you have 3-4 hours to kill, might as well give it a try.
Platinum Trophy: Got it. It's really easy, althought there are many missable trophies so following a guide is adviced.

Black Mirror - 7.0 / 10
No not the series. Yes I also got excited at first, and that's what got me to try the game so, nice move I guess? Anyways, this is a reboot of a much older game; and I gotta say that, despite not being great, it just nails atmosphere thanks to its lighting. Even with not-so-good graphics, the dark areas in this game look so damn good. You'll be exploring a creepy mansion and solving puzzles in order to uncover its secrets. The story was good enough to keep me interested. Worse part is the animations tho. Everyone's so stiff they might aswell be trying to act normal while holding in a crap.
Platinum Trophy: Got it, easy and short, with just a couple of missable ones you'll want to keep an eye on. 2 / 10.

I'll talk about 2 more games that I played before quarantine (a long time ago actually), but that I revisited during lockdown while getting all the remaining trophies.

Lords of the Fallen - 6.8 / 10
This was my first souls-like outside of Dark Souls and Bloodborne... and it made me appreciate how good Dark Souls and Bloodborne truly are. Now, I can't say I didn't have fun, but I feel everything this game does is ok at best. The level design is ok, the enemies and bosses are ok, the gameplay feels sluggish and your attacks are... just... so... slow... No jolly coop or pvp either.
Platinum Trophy: I got it. It isn't hard for a souls-like, just kinda tedious. There are many collectibles, some of which only appear on NG+, and you need to beat the game, I think, 3 times. 5 / 10.

Everybody's Gone to the Rapture - 8.0 / 10
In this narrative-driven game you play as a turtle while visiting an abandoned city called Yaughton. For some reason there's not a single human being in sight and everyone seems to have disappear into thin air. First of all, this game takes the "Walking Simulator" title quite seriously. If you thought that controlling a turtle sounds weird that's because I made it up you just walk really damn slow. That being said, the story's pretty good. While exploring you'll find "memories" of the past, and you'll hear conversations that took place there -- soon enough you'll start to recognize voices, names, characters, and the game will follow their journey while they try to understand wtf is happening, just like you. It's amazing how they grow on you even tho you never actually see them.
Platinum Trophy: It's a walking simulator so it's as easy as it gets. You do have to get all the collectibles and listen to all conversations, so a guide will prove useful. 1 / 10.

My friends, this is not the end. There's still plenty of games for me to talk about. Once again, thank you for liking my post, I'll see you soon!
submitted by AsDaysFade to patientgamers

Creating A Very Simple Shooting Index


Wanting to expand on some of the ideas in this post, this post, and even this most recent post, I thought a lot about the process of creating a one-number summary of a player's shooting ability.
Shockingly, I still find people arguing about the shooting capabilities of particular players with these stats (in order of decreasing awfulness):
-eFG% and TS
-Shooting Splits
I almost feel like it's too obvious to go over why this makes so sense, but then again, I still see people cite these stats. At a basic level, all of these stats include shots at the rim, which I'm not interested in with a shooting statistic. Even if that wasn't the case, they also just mash everything up, so you can't actually glean if a player is a good midrange shooter, a good three point shooter, or both. And at a more advanced level, they don't look at context: was this player shooting off the dribble? Were they tightly defended? Do they sit in the corner waiting for a pass?
What I wanted was a program that would automatically perform my general process when I check how good of a shooter a player is: check midrange splits, look at 3 point percentage, how often they shoot in the corner, look at assist rate, and, if I really need to be thorough, look at average defender distance. Generally, these things give a good idea of a shooter's capabilities.
Througout this post, it's important to keep in mind what this IS and what this is NOT. This is not a statistically perfect method of determining the best shooters. This says nothing about the value that these players provide. All this post is is an exploration of an idea, the thought process that goes into thinking about creating a one-number statistic, and a quick and dirty way to double check if a player is actually a good shooter or not (for the next time you get into a spat with someone on the nba subreddit.)

If you're not interested in the thought process behind the index, just skip to the results section to see the tables and plots! :)

The Data

I could go into all sorts of ideal scenarios, considerations, and hyper-specific concerns of what I would want from a shooting statistic, but all of that is pointless unless I can get data that actually reflects those ideas. What I mean is, if I want to adjust for defender distance, it doesn't matter unless I can actually find data that includes defender distance.
The data that I got a hold of takes every shot attempt from 2013, and has the following information:
Zone: either <10 feet, >=10 feet (2 point attempt), or 3 point attempt
Defender distance: wide open (6+ feet of space), open (4-6 feet), tight (2-4 feet), or very tight (0-2 feet)
Shot clock: 24-20, 19-15, etc.
Number of dribbles before attempt: 0, 1, 2, etc
Touch time: <2 seconds, 2-4 seconds, 4-6, 6+
The good: we have defender distance, which is probably the most important metric to keep track of. We have a way to exclude shots around the rim, and we have a discriminant between midrange and 3 point attempts.
The bad: I was hoping to get finer resolution on the zones; splitting up between "short" midrange and "long" midrange can be helpful, as well as splitting up the 3 point zone between corner and above the break shots. Ideally I would just have a raw distance from the basket, but oh well. We also don't have assist rates, which I was hoping to use as a proxy for catch and shoot, but that's okay (more on this later.)


I decided to go with a simple logistic regression for this project. The goal here is NOT to create the perfect shooting index. With the lacking data I have and the limited statistics knowledge I possess, there is no way I could come up with anything more comprehensive or statistically powerful as what was done, here, here, or even here
On the other side of things, there still needs to be some sort of methodology. I can't just wave my hands and vaguely account for defender distance by saying it should probably be, like, 2%+ per every 2 feet of space the player gets and wiggle that number until it sorta looks right.
So let's think about the predictor variables we have.
Defender distance seems like it should obviously have the most weight to it, so there's no additional pre-processing we need to do with that predictor. As a very simple check, let's look at what our regression predicts a player's 3P% should be based on defender distance alone just to make sure we're not making any immediately obvious mistakes:
Defender Distance Predicted 3P%
Very Tight 26%
Tight 30%
Open 34%
Wide Open 39%
I vaguely recall Ben Taylor tweeting about wide open 3 point attempts last year, and stating that league average (when wide open) was 40%, so this seems very reasonable and believable.
Now, I could just run the regression on all the predictors listed earlier, but I'd like to comb the data a bit before I do that. Shot clock time doesn't actually seem like a real predictor of anything; what I mean is that taking a shot at 18 seconds probably shouldn't have much of a difference between taking an identical shot at 12 seconds. If anything, shot clock seems like it's probably just correlated to defender distance. What I attempted to do was split up shot clock into 2 groups: <4 seconds and >4 seconds. I figured that taking a shot at almost any time is not going to have an effect, but less than 4 seconds might cause the player to rush the shot. The issue is that when you do this, it becomes heavily correlated with defender distance, making it pretty redundant. Thus, I opted to just scrap shot clock as a predictor.
For dribble time and touch time, I figured that they were in and of themselves correlated, so I combined them into a single predictor. I also figured that the most relevant information was when touch time and dribbles were very low vs very high. I mentioned earlier that I wanted assist rate as a predictor, because I think it is a good proxy for shot difficulty. Well instead, I decided could just classify "touch time < 2 seconds" & "dribbles < 2" as a catch and shoot, and everything else as a pull up attempt to get a rough estimate for catch and shoot vs pull up players. Generally, the idea is that if you have a touch time > 2 seconds before taking a shot, you're probably isolating the possession. And isolation shots are usually more difficult than catch and shoot. An unintended consequence of the change of this grouping was that it made our defender distance predictor less correlated with our new catch & shoot predictor. Great!
So, living up to our title, we have a very simple predictor of FG%; all we use is defender distance in 4 bins, and a catch & shoot or pull-up category.
Let's run the regression and look at the midrange and 3 point categories and see if it passes the "sniff test", so to speak:
Player Expected Midrange %
Horford 43%
Griffin 43%
Ibaka 42%
Towns 42%
... ...
Gay 40%
Hood 40%
Durant 40%
Crawford 39%
So far so good; Ibaka and Horford are good names to see at the top of the list, as they generally take spot up, wide open mid range shots. Seeing Durant, Gay, and Crawford at the bottom of the list also seems reasonable. Other names near the bottom of the list: Irving, Carmelo, Wiggins, Booker. Now let's take a look at three point shooting:
Player Expected 3P %
Gasol 38%
Horford 38%
B. Lopez 37%
Millsap 37%
... ...
Crawford 33%
Lillard 33%
Durant 33%
Harden 32%
Again, this looks very reasonable. Seeing Harden at the very bottom of the list is a good sign, as well as Lillard.
Now all that's left is to determine the actual "score", which, again, we're going to keep very simple. The score is just going to be FG% - expected FG% for each zone, and then averaged.
For example, if player A is 45% from midrange and 35% from 3, but has expected values of 38% from midrange and 36% from three, their score is
((45-38) + (35-36) / 2) = 3


After running the regressions, here is what the top 7 and bottom 7 look like (of players who have at least 1000 midrange and 3 point attempts in the last 7 seasons):
Player C&S Percentage Shooting Score
Curry 55% 8.1
Durant 58% 7.6
Redick 81% 7.1
Chris Paul 16% 6.8
McCollum 41% 6.3
Klay 75% 6.1
Irving 33% 6.0
... ... ...
Westbrook 21% -2.3
Wall 26% -2.4
Rubio 51% -2.7
Griffin 57% -3.0
Wiggins 43% -3.2
Jeff Green 64% -3.8
Giannis 37% -6.6
The reason I like to list C&S percentage alongside these results is that people have different ideas of what a "good shooter" entails. The ability to create a shot by moving off ball and shooting after curling off of a screen is a different kind of difficult than being able to create a shot with the ball in your hands like Harden does. So, to some people, it might be pertinent to only compare shooting scores with players who have a similar play style (and C&S can sometimes be a good proxy for that.)

To see this list as a visualization, you can click here.

For an additional visualization, here is the graph of midrange scores vs three point scores, so you can see the players that are particularly good at one over the other.

Only a handful of players are labeled to keep it from being crowded. If you're curious about a name that didn't show up, it's probably an issue of the midrange cutoff; I set both 3P and midrange attempts to > 1000 to avoid clutter in the graphs. If you're curious about any particular players that you can't find, let me know and I'll grab the values for you!
For the most part, this shooting score is not that much different than a naive score (just averaging midrange and 3P percentages), which is good; we shouldn't expect a gigantic shuffling of players. But we do see a small handful of drastic changes in expected places: in a naive ranking, James Harden is ranked 48th, Lillard 21st, Ibaka is 17th, and Kevin Love is ranked 49th. In this model, however, Harden goes to 18th (+30), Lillard goes to 15th (+6), Love goes to 60th (-11) Ibaka goes to 43rd (-26).


The names that we expected to see are there:
Curry and Durant top off the list, and our friend Chris Paul lands very high, which I'm happy to see. Harden gets a big boost due to his difficult shot selection, and Lillard does as well. Lillard might not be as high as I'd like him to be, but that's an issue with the data; Lillard takes the deepest threes in the league, but I didn't have access to that with this data set.
Names that stuck out:
McCollum finally gets his due here as an absolutely elite mid range shooter. He doesn't get enough praise for how nuts he is in that area.
Jamal crawford is rated surprisingly high despite his pedestrian percentages; he apparently has one of the most difficult shot selections in the league.
Aaron Gordon didn't show up on the plots and tables I shared because of a midrange attempt cutoff, but he's secretly one of the worst shooters in the league. I knew he was bad, but he has some of the easiest attempts in the league and simply can't find a way to convert.
Anthony Davis also shows up near the bottom of the list. He's credited as a below average midrange shooter, and an awful three point shooter. I'm sure if I used only the last couple of years, his name would jump up the list a bit, but it still surprised me.
Jokic is a below average three point shooter, but (if you lower the attempt requirement a bit,) shows up as the third best midrange shooter, behind CP3 and Durant. Very impressive and unexpected (to me.)
Arron Afflalo. Surprisingly good all-around shooter. Just kinda forgot about that guy to be honest.
A consideration to make here is about volume. Usually, volume is a proxy for shot difficulty, so a low volume would assumed to not have much of an effect here. However, there might be something to be said here for how you're defended. If a player takes very few mid range shots, the defender might not expect it, even though they'd be listed as "tightly guarding" the player shooting. Conversely, a player like Harden might be even better than the list would indicate because the defender goes into the matchup knowing almost exactly what he's going to do (step back three), and Harden is still able to convert at a high clip. Maybe this has almost no effect, but I thought it might be something worth mentioning.
Another consideration is that "creating space" is sometimes in and of itself more difficult than a tightly guarded shot. Again using Harden as an example, him doing a stepback might create enough space for the shot to be listed as "open", meaning the regression would expect a higher probability of making the shot. But this act of creating space might be seen as more difficult than shooting a tightly contested shot in the first place. It all comes down to the definition of "shooting". Regardless, we don't have access to information that specific anyway.
I'm pretty happy with how this turned out; again, this is not a perfect or even particularly good statistic; I mostly just wanted a program I could run to generate a list I could glance at when someone says Player A is a good/bad shooter to see if it warrants a closer investigation. I also made it because, to be honest, I was surprised that a very simple shooting index didn't really exist anywhere. I'm certain many people have done it before at a basic level, but all of the good ones are proprietary or using data that is no longer publicly available.
One note is that I could have included FT% as part of "shooting". I didn't add it because I was feeling lazy, to be honest. I don't think it would change much, but I would be interested in seeing the outlier, e.g., players with a high shooting index but low FT% and vice versa.
If there's interest, I can PM a google sheets file with the full list of players with their C&S percentages, expected FG% from each zone, and overall shooting score. I would link it here, but I'm not sure if it's against the rules so I'll refrain.
submitted by DingusMcCringus to nbadiscussion

0 thoughts on “Mixvibes cross dj 2.0 cracked photoshop

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *